X
Logical  Fallacy: a error in reasoning
  (adj)     (noun)

(beta)
List Of Fallacies
Play More
Score:
0


About This Game

Feedback Here
Or On Facebook

Statement #135 Discussion

0 comments
All Discussions

Below is the statement as it appears with the fallacy marked as correct. You can see the totals of most frequent responses to this statement. And after reading the any discussion going on below, you can select your choice(s) for the correct answer. For now, whoever posts each statement can update corrections.
Who cares if you can show flaws in the official narrative. That's not the same as proving it wrong!
Burden of Proof
Ad Ignorantiam

AKA Appeal to Ignorance

Category: Fallacies of Relevance (Red Herrings) → Distracting Appeals

Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:

  1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
  2. Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.
In many situations, one side has the burden of proof resting on it. This side is obligated to provide evidence for its position. The claim of the other side, the one that does not bear the burden of proof, is assumed to be true unless proven otherwise. The difficulty in such cases is determining which side, if any, the burden of proof rests on. In many cases, settling this issue can be a matter of significant debate. In some cases the burden of proof is set by the situation. For example, in American law a person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty (hence the burden of proof is on the prosecution). As another example, in debate the burden of proof is placed on the affirmative team. As a final example, in most cases the burden of proof rests on those who claim something exists (such as Bigfoot, psychic powers, universals, and sense data).

Click For Fallacy Description

 821 Total Answer Attempts   52%
 425 Correctly Popped Fallacies
 396 Incorrectly Un/Popped
posted by We Deserve Better     

Most Common Responses

 
425 - Burden of Proof
29 - Confusing Cause and Effect
26 - Relativist Fallacy
21 - Begging the Question
20 - Red Herring
19 - Appeal to Popularity
18 - Fallacy of Composition
18 - Ignoring a Common Cause
16 - Fallacy of Division
15 - Appeal to Spite
14 - Misleading Vividness
14 - Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
13 - Appeal to Ridicule
12 - Hasty Generalization
11 - Middle Ground
11 - Appeal to Belief
11 - Personal Attack
10 - False Dilemma
10 - Genetic Fallacy
10 - Special Pleading
10 - Biased Generalization
9 - Circumstantial Ad Hominem
9 - Appeal to Novelty
9 - Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
8 - Slippery Slope
7 - Poisoning the Well
6 - Appeal to Common Practice
6 - Appeal to Authority
5 - Appeal to Emotion
5 - Ad Hominem
4 - Appeal to Tradition
4 - Peer Pressure
4 - Gambler's Fallacy
4 - Guilt by Association
3 - Post Hoc
2 - Appeal to Pity
2 - Appeal to Fear
1 - Appeal to Flattery

Likes for Correct Answers

Show all on page ↑

+









Play Game - Fallacy List - Add Statements - Player Collections - Discussions

Login - High Scores - About - Trivium - Links - Contact

Donate To DontFallacy.Me - Support Dr. Labossiere

Creative Commons, 2014, Wiki World Order (Morgan Lesko)


* Fallacious statements are usually paired with a random image of a person who never spoke those words.
This free site is for educational purposes, studying intellectual dishonesty. The images are being used under fair use. Sunflower by robstephaustrali.