X
Logical  Fallacy: a error in reasoning
  (adj)     (noun)

(beta)
List Of Fallacies
Play More
Score:
0


About This Game

Feedback Here
Or On Facebook

Statement #49 Discussion

This Example Has Been Deactivated
2 comments (1 thead)
All Discussions

Below is the statement as it appears with the fallacy marked as correct. You can see the totals of most frequent responses to this statement. And after reading the any discussion going on below, you can select your choice(s) for the correct answer. For now, whoever posts each statement can update corrections.
Andrea Dworkin has written several books arguing that pornography harms women. But Dworkin is just ugly and bitter, so why should we listen to her?
Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
AKA "You Too Fallacy"

Category: Fallacies of Relevance (Red Herrings) → Ad hominems (Genetic Fallacies)

This fallacy is committed when it is concluded that a person's claim is false because 1) it is inconsistent with something else a person has said or 2) what a person says is inconsistent with her actions. This type of "argument" has the following form:

  1. Person A makes claim X.
  2. Person B asserts that A's actions or past claims are inconsistent with the truth of claim X.
  3. Therefore X is false.
The fact that a person makes inconsistent claims does not make any particular claim he makes false (although of any pair of inconsistent claims only one can be true-but both can be false). Also, the fact that a person's claims are not consistent with his actions might indicate that the person is a hypocrite but this does not prove his claims are false.

Click For Fallacy Description

 630 Total Answer Attempts   46%
 292 Correctly Popped Fallacies
 338 Incorrectly Un/Popped
posted by wikiworldorder     url: writingcente...
( Random Image )

Most Common Responses

 
292 - Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
70 - Personal Attack
53 - Ad Hominem
39 - Circumstantial Ad Hominem
31 - Poisoning the Well
30 - Appeal to Ridicule
16 - Appeal to Spite
11 - Red Herring
9 - Fallacy of Composition
8 - Genetic Fallacy
6 - Biased Generalization
6 - Guilt by Association
5 - Appeal to Novelty
5 - Misleading Vividness
5 - Appeal to Flattery
5 - Appeal to Popularity
4 - Post Hoc
4 - Burden of Proof
4 - Fallacy of Division
4 - Begging the Question
3 - Relativist Fallacy
3 - Ignoring a Common Cause
2 - Appeal to Tradition
2 - Appeal to Emotion
2 - False Dilemma
2 - Slippery Slope
2 - Appeal to Belief
2 - Hasty Generalization
2 - Special Pleading
2 - Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
1 - Confusing Cause and Effect

Likes for Correct Answers

Show all on page ↑

Show All Comments On One Page
Threads Sorted by Date - Sort by Likes
+
Not "you too"
I don't think the fallacy here is Ad Hominem Tu Quoque. If Andrea D. was making pornography and making books against it, then it would be appropriate to say, " Andrea writes anti porn books, but also works in the industry. Therefore she has no room to talk. That is not the type of reasoning used here. There is a statement made about Andrea, and then what follows is a personal attack on Andrea in regards to here appearance.

5.4.15 08:17 by triviummethodman
1      0

  + Reply 1 comment downstream. Please read it before replying.



+









Play Game - Fallacy List - Add Statements - Player Collections - Discussions

Login - High Scores - About - Trivium - Links - Contact

Donate To DontFallacy.Me - Support Dr. Labossiere

Creative Commons, 2014, Wiki World Order (Morgan Lesko)


* Fallacious statements are usually paired with a random image of a person who never spoke those words.
This free site is for educational purposes, studying intellectual dishonesty. The images are being used under fair use. Sunflower by robstephaustrali.