X
Logical  Fallacy: a error in reasoning
  (adj)     (noun)

(beta)
List Of Fallacies
Play More
Score:
0


About This Game

Feedback Here
Or On Facebook

Statement #o58 Discussion

0 comments
All Discussions

Below is the statement as it appears with the fallacy marked as correct. You can see the totals of most frequent responses to this statement. And after reading the any discussion going on below, you can select your choice(s) for the correct answer. For now, whoever posts each statement can update corrections.
"You cannot prove that God does not exist, so He does."
Burden of Proof
Ad Ignorantiam

AKA Appeal to Ignorance

Category: Fallacies of Relevance (Red Herrings) → Distracting Appeals

Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form:

  1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B.
  2. Side B claims that X is false because there is no proof for X.
In many situations, one side has the burden of proof resting on it. This side is obligated to provide evidence for its position. The claim of the other side, the one that does not bear the burden of proof, is assumed to be true unless proven otherwise. The difficulty in such cases is determining which side, if any, the burden of proof rests on. In many cases, settling this issue can be a matter of significant debate. In some cases the burden of proof is set by the situation. For example, in American law a person is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty (hence the burden of proof is on the prosecution). As another example, in debate the burden of proof is placed on the affirmative team. As a final example, in most cases the burden of proof rests on those who claim something exists (such as Bigfoot, psychic powers, universals, and sense data).

Click For Fallacy Description

 1,310 Total Answer Attempts   76%
 991 Correctly Popped Fallacies
 319 Incorrectly Un/Popped
( Random Image )

Most Common Responses

 
991 - Burden of Proof
23 - Appeal to Belief
23 - False Dilemma
22 - Relativist Fallacy
22 - Begging the Question
18 - Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
17 - Genetic Fallacy
14 - Misleading Vividness
12 - Biased Generalization
12 - Circumstantial Ad Hominem
12 - Appeal to Popularity
11 - Appeal to Common Practice
11 - Hasty Generalization
10 - Fallacy of Composition
10 - Personal Attack
9 - Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
8 - Ignoring a Common Cause
7 - Fallacy of Division
7 - Post Hoc
7 - Appeal to Ridicule
6 - Confusing Cause and Effect
6 - Slippery Slope
6 - Appeal to Authority
6 - Poisoning the Well
6 - Red Herring
5 - Appeal to Tradition
4 - Ad Hominem
4 - Appeal to Spite
4 - Gambler's Fallacy
4 - Appeal to Emotion
3 - Guilt by Association
3 - Appeal to Novelty
2 - Special Pleading
2 - Appeal to Flattery
1 - Middle Ground
1 - Peer Pressure
1 - Appeal to Pity

Likes for Correct Answers

Show all on page ↑

+









Play Game - Fallacy List - Add Statements - Player Collections - Discussions

Login - High Scores - About - Trivium - Links - Contact

Donate To DontFallacy.Me - Support Dr. Labossiere

Creative Commons, 2014, Wiki World Order (Morgan Lesko)


* Fallacious statements are usually paired with a random image of a person who never spoke those words.
This free site is for educational purposes, studying intellectual dishonesty. The images are being used under fair use. Sunflower by robstephaustrali. Bret Baier image owned by FOX.