X
Logical  Fallacy: a error in reasoning
  (adj)     (noun)

(beta)
List Of Fallacies
Play More
Score:
0


About This Game

Feedback Here
Or On Facebook

Statement #o7 Discussion

0 comments
All Discussions

Below is the statement as it appears with the fallacy marked as correct. You can see the totals of most frequent responses to this statement. And after reading the any discussion going on below, you can select your choice(s) for the correct answer. For now, whoever posts each statement can update corrections.
It can never happen to me. If I believed it could, I could never sleep soundly at night.
Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
Argumentum Ad Consequentium

Category: Fallacies of Relevance (Red Herrings) → Distracting Appeals

The Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief is a fallacy that comes in the following patterns:

#1: X is true because if people did not accept X as being true, then there would be negative consequences.
#2: X is false because if people did not accept X as being false, then there would be negative consequences.

#3: X is true because accepting that X is true has positive consequences.
#4: X is false because accepting that X is false has positive consequences.

#5: I wish that X were true, therefore X is true. This is known as Wishful Thinking.
#6: I wish that X were false, therefore X is false. This is known as Wishful Thinking.

This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because the consequences of a belief have no bearing on whether the belief is true or false. For example, if someone were to say "If sixteen-headed purple unicorns don't exist, then I would be miserable, so they must exist", it would be clear that this would not be a good line of reasoning. It is important to note that the consequences in question are the consequences that stem from the belief. It is important to distinguish between a rational reason to believe (RRB) (evidence) and a prudential reason to believe (PRB) (motivation). A RRB is evidence that objectively and logically supports the claim. A PRB is a reason to accept the belief because of some external factor (such as fear, a threat, or a benefit or harm that may stem from the belief) that is relevant to what a person values but is not relevant to the truth or falsity of the claim. The nature of the fallacy is especially clear in the case of Wishful thinking. Obviously, merely wishing that something is true does not make it true. This fallacy differs from the Appeal to Belief fallacy in that the Appeal to Belief involves taking a claim that most people believe that X is true to be evidence for X being true.

Click For Fallacy Description

 963 Total Answer Attempts   71%
 683 Correctly Popped Fallacies
 280 Incorrectly Un/Popped
( Random Image )

Most Common Responses

 
683 - Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
23 - Appeal to Belief
20 - Appeal to Fear
20 - Relativist Fallacy
17 - False Dilemma
17 - Misleading Vividness
15 - Gambler's Fallacy
14 - Special Pleading
13 - Appeal to Emotion
13 - Begging the Question
11 - Burden of Proof
11 - Confusing Cause and Effect
11 - Slippery Slope
8 - Ignoring a Common Cause
8 - Red Herring
7 - Biased Generalization
6 - Appeal to Common Practice
6 - Appeal to Flattery
6 - Genetic Fallacy
5 - Appeal to Pity
5 - Fallacy of Composition
5 - Appeal to Spite
4 - Hasty Generalization
4 - Post Hoc
4 - Circumstantial Ad Hominem
4 - Poisoning the Well
4 - Ad Hominem
3 - Guilt by Association
2 - Fallacy of Division
2 - Personal Attack
2 - Appeal to Ridicule
2 - Peer Pressure
2 - Appeal to Authority
2 - Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
1 - Appeal to Novelty
1 - Appeal to Popularity
1 - Appeal to Tradition
1 - Middle Ground

Likes for Correct Answers

Show all on page ↑

+









Play Game - Fallacy List - Add Statements - Player Collections - Discussions

Login - High Scores - About - Trivium - Links - Contact

Donate To DontFallacy.Me - Support Dr. Labossiere

Creative Commons, 2014, Wiki World Order (Morgan Lesko)


* Fallacious statements are usually paired with a random image of a person who never spoke those words.
This free site is for educational purposes, studying intellectual dishonesty. The images are being used under fair use. Sunflower by robstephaustrali. Boris & Natasha image owned by Jay Ward Productions.