X
Logical  Fallacy: a error in reasoning
  (adj)     (noun)

(beta)
List Of Fallacies
Play More
Score:
0


About This Game

Feedback Here
Or On Facebook

Statement #133 Discussion

1 comment (1 thead)
All Discussions

Below is the statement as it appears with the fallacy marked as correct. You can see the totals of most frequent responses to this statement. And after reading the any discussion going on below, you can select your choice(s) for the correct answer. For now, whoever posts each statement can update corrections.
Details of our lovely visit to Italy and its gorgeous countryside
Misleading Vividness
Category: Fallacies of Relevance (Red Herrings) → Distracting Appeals

Misleading Vividness is a fallacy in which a very small number of particularly dramatic events are taken to outweigh a significant amount of statistical evidence. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:

  1. Dramatic or vivid event X occurs (and is not in accord with the majority of the statistical evidence).
  2. Therefore events of type X are likely to occur.
This sort of "reasoning" is fallacious because the mere fact that an event is particularly vivid or dramatic does not make the event more likely to occur, especially in the face of significant statistical evidence.

People often accept this sort of "reasoning" because particularly vivid or dramatic cases tend to make a very strong impression on the human mind. For example, if a person survives a particularly awful plane crash, he might be inclined to believe that air travel is more dangerous than other forms of travel. After all, explosions and people dying around him will have a more significant impact on his mind than will the rather dull statistics that a person is more likely to be struck by lightning than killed in a plane crash.

It should be kept in mind that taking into account the possibility of something dramatic or vivid occurring is not always fallacious. For example, a person might decide to never go sky diving because the effects of an accident can be very, very dramatic. If he knows that, statistically, the chances of the accident are happening are very low but he considers even a small risk to be unacceptable, then he would not be making an error in reasoning.

Click For Fallacy Description

 937 Total Answer Attempts   56%
 525 Correctly Popped Fallacies
 412 Incorrectly Un/Popped
posted by aerin1     
( Random Image )

Most Common Responses

 
525 - Misleading Vividness
56 - Appeal to Flattery
32 - Biased Generalization
25 - Appeal to Emotion
24 - Red Herring
23 - Begging the Question
23 - Hasty Generalization
21 - Appeal to Novelty
18 - Fallacy of Composition
17 - Confusing Cause and Effect
14 - Appeal to Belief
13 - Appeal to Common Practice
12 - Post Hoc
11 - Middle Ground
11 - Appeal to the Consequences of a Belief
10 - Special Pleading
10 - Burden of Proof
9 - Appeal to Popularity
9 - Fallacy of Division
8 - Ad Hominem Tu Quoque
8 - Genetic Fallacy
7 - Poisoning the Well
6 - Circumstantial Ad Hominem
5 - Appeal to Tradition
5 - Ignoring a Common Cause
5 - Ad Hominem
5 - Guilt by Association
4 - Peer Pressure
4 - Appeal to Spite
4 - Relativist Fallacy
3 - Gambler's Fallacy
3 - Slippery Slope
2 - Appeal to Pity
2 - Appeal to Authority
2 - False Dilemma
1 - Appeal to Ridicule

Likes for Correct Answers

Show all on page ↑

+
What?
This isn't even a complete sentence.

5.3.15 16:19 by Scythe
1      0

  + Reply 0 comments downstream.



+









Play Game - Fallacy List - Add Statements - Player Collections - Discussions

Login - High Scores - About - Trivium - Links - Contact

Donate To DontFallacy.Me - Support Dr. Labossiere

Creative Commons, 2014, Wiki World Order (Morgan Lesko)


* Fallacious statements are usually paired with a random image of a person who never spoke those words.
This free site is for educational purposes, studying intellectual dishonesty. The images are being used under fair use. Sunflower by robstephaustrali. Brian Williams image owned by NBC.